Tuesday, May 29, 2012

BP Committed to Developing TAP, Executive ... - LNG World News

BP Committed to Developing TAP, Executive Says

BP of UK, the operator of the Shah Deniz natural gas field in Azerbaijan, expressed its commitment to developing the Trans Adriatic Pipeline (TAP) as the southern gas transportation route into Europe.

Speaking at the BP Forum in Berlin, on Thursday, Iain Conn, Chief Executive Refining and Marketing at BP, reaffirmed the company?s commitment to work together with TAP and the governments of the transit countries to obtain the necessary permits and approvals for the project: ?The Shah Deniz partners have been looking at two basic options within the EU market. The first is the southern route through Greece and Albania to Italy. The second is into the markets of south-eastern and central Europe.?

Conn clarified that the EU Member States and the European Commission have recognised in November 2011 that ?where the gas flows from the border of the EU single market is and should be a matter for normal commercial decisions.

Shah Deniz partners recently selected the Trans Adriatic Pipeline for the southern option to Italy. Exclusive negotiations are now in progress with TAP and there is no possibility of continuing with the Interconnector Turkey/Greece/Italy (ITGI) project to carry Azeri gas. Nabucco West and the South East Europe Pipeline (SEEP) are currently competing for the south-eastern and central European route.

?If Italy wishes to import Southern Corridor gas, it will need to be through the TAP project. And we are committed to working with the Italian, Greek and Albanian governments, and with TAP, to gain all the required regulatory approvals and permits to make this pipeline option a success.?

The Shah Deniz consortium partners are currently evaluating the submissions made on the 16th of May by Nabucco West and SEEP and will select their preferred option by end of June 2012. A final market and route selection between TAP and the winner of the South-Eastern and Central European route is expected before June 2013.

?I should emphasize again that all of these options have strategic value and offer the necessary scope for scalability as future gas supplies become available. There is no pre-determined winner, the competition is fully open and there is still everything to play for?, added Conn.


LNG World News Staff, May 28, 2012; Image: BP

?

pranks pregnancy test april fools day 2012 ja rule amityville horror acm passover recipes

Massive Banner Advertising Mistakes You Need To Avoid | weicome ...

Posted on 29-05-2012 by admin

It?s no joke at all that banner advertising is powerful; you can send massive targeted traffic to your site and do what you want with it. It doesn?t matter at all that lots of people have forgotten about banner advertising because of Google and Bing, that?s fine for all the banner advertisers out there. Why do you think huge corporations and media outlets spend millions on banner advertising each month? Never think banner ads are going away, and they shouldn?t because they still work! Lots of people make costly mistakes with banner ads, and while some may not be avoidable many others can be avoided.

And that would mean a loss of money and an investment gone wrong. So here we go ? how to side-step typical newbie banner advertising mistakes.

Ok, you?re going for banner advertising ? yay ? but, when you create campaigns you have to also think of your campaign and include your landing page when you make banners. All prospects are selfish, even you and me, when we?re on the hunt for something; what that means is they?re not concerned about the images on your banner ? they want to know how they will benefit from your offer. It?s just that you need to deliver the goods that you mentioned on your banner. Get that promise wrong and you?re making a huge mistake that will represent a waste of money unless you learn your lesson. It?s a pretty stupid simple concept, but people make this mistake ? and now you know how to avoid it.

On the other hand, we do suggest that you avoid making your banners too ?busy? with too much in them. Your message needs to be very clear and easy to understand. If you?re branding your company, we recommend testing with and without your logo because people can see your logo on your site ? but test.

You know banner ads don?t allow for much space, so you really have to choose wisely how you use that space. You must hit their hot buttons right away, so be short and concise with your copy. Did you see the possibilities for what can be done in your web business? One thing is certain, though, and that is perhaps 99% of any kind of online venture can stand to have more promotional methods put to work. Perhaps the worst thing any business owner can do is start taking success for granted and becoming ungrateful for it. So do not allow that to happen to you, and we talk about expanding marketing efforts all the time for that reason. You can learn how to use AppEmpire in your business and become profitable, of course, but forget autopilot internet riches and keep working hard as well as smarter. If you want to build a long-term business on the web, then you have to be the business person and maintain your dedication while you continue to prosper.

Last but not the least; as an advertiser you should be aware of the basic metrics such as the size of your ads. If you don?t have knowledge about this, then you?ll be in for some hassle. It?s because when you run your banner ads, publishers will want to know clear cut specifications from you in relation to your banner?s size, which would be the length, the size and the weight. Since you?ll be dealing with people all around the world, just stick to a standard called, IAB, and you shouldn?t have any problems. Like we said, banner advertising isn?t hard to do, and there?s much information available that you can read. Once you know the ins and outs of banner advertising you?ll be able to tap into the massive power of this promotional medium and get as much targeted traffic as you want. It is important to avoid getting impatient with the process because it dos take just a little of time.

This entry was posted in general and tagged business, make money online, marketing, work from home.

time magazine person of the year time magazine person of the year la clippers verizon galaxy nexus verizon galaxy nexus lawrence lessig lawrence lessig

Canada's jobs comeback? Too good to be true

OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canada created a stunning 140,000 jobs in just two months this year, the most in 30 years and a source of pride for a government bragging that the economy has got its moxie back.

But scratch the surface of the official data, and stir in a few secondary figures, and the picture looks far less upbeat.

Canada is definitely creating jobs, but the figures are volatile at the best of times. There's also been an increase in involuntary part-time work, a decline in employment quality and a fall in real wages.

Experts say the heavy hiring in the construction industry - the main factor underpinning jobs growth in March and April - is not sustainable, and layoffs there, along with thousands of public sector dismissals, will dampen employment and drive up the jobless rate.

"I view these last two months as anomalies," said David Gray, an economist at the University of Ottawa who specializes in labor market policy.

Gray predicts continued unevenness and conditions that create "winners and losers" in the labor market, widening the income distribution gap.

Canada recovered from recession-era job losses far faster than Europe or the United States, winning back the 400,000 jobs lost in the slowdown by January 2011 as the economy bounced back from a recession that was also milder than the U.S. one.

BUST TO BOOM

But the jobs juggernaut slowed to a crawl by mid-2011 as economic growth slowed, and suddenly Canada was the weakling compared to the U.S. Its economy added just 7,000 net new jobs from July-December.

The unexpectedly strong job gains in March and April - the equivalent of 1.3 million jobs in the far bigger U.S. economy - flipped that downturn round again in a bust-to-boom swing that Benjamin Tal, senior economist at CIBC World Markets, described as dizzying.

"We have to be smart about it and focus on the trend because you cannot have negative numbers and then an 80,000 change in one month," said Tal, who favors looking at a six-month trend. "It's ridiculous. It's not telling the story."

May jobs figures are due on June 8.

Canada's most-watched jobs figures come from the labor force survey, released a few days after the end of the month, and based on interviews with 56,000 households.

A separate report on payroll employment, earnings and hours is based on data from businesses - similar to the main U.S. payrolls data - and appears with a six-week delay.

And the nature of the household survey means the main Canadian figures are particularly prone to sampling error.

April job growth came in at a confidence-building 58,200. But there's a 68 percent chance that the actual figure was between 29,600 and 86,800, and a 5 percent chance that it could be below 1,000, or above 115,400.

The household and payrolls surveys reports usually show a similar trend. But in the three months from December to February, the household survey showed a gain of 5,700 jobs while the payrolls data showed a loss of 6,000 jobs.

THE GOLDILOCKS NUMBER

Tal calculates job creation at about 22,000 new posts a month on average. "The trend is showing that we're slowing but we're not crashing by any stretch of the imagination," he said.

The recent volatility in the figures has raised eyebrows from the experts, and Stefane Marion, chief economist at National Bank Financial, wants Statscan to release the two jobs reports simultaneously so people can cross-check the data.

Late last year, Marion was at a loss to explain why Quebec, the country's biggest province by area, appeared to be hemorrhaging jobs at a rate that could only mean a severe recession while other indicators suggested a healthy economy.

The confusion, which came as federal and provincial governments were drafting their budgets, could have influenced fiscal and monetary policy, Marion argues.

"It came at a time when Europe was going downhill and so people were saying 'oh, the recession is here now,'" he said.

The Quebec job numbers eventually bounced back, but by then Marion and others had learned to treat the monthly data with a healthy amount of caution.

INVOLUNTARY PART-TIMERS

The underlying trends from the data are also less strong than the headline numbers. In one sign of slack, about 10 percent of part-time workers could not find a full-time job, down from 2010 but well above the pre-recession level of about 6.5 percent.

Canada's unemployment rate at 7.3 percent is 1.3 percentage points higher than its 2008 trough and 1.4 million workers were unemployed in April compared with 1.1 million before the crisis.

The U.S. jobless rate is 8.1 percent, although not really comparable because of different methodologies.

Wages are another indication the market is not booming. They rose 2.3 percent in 2011 while inflation was 2.9 percent. In 2008, wages grew 5 percent.

The employment rate, the measure of people with jobs relative to the overall population, is 61.9 percent. The rate was above 63 percent in the two years prior to the crisis when the labor market was very buoyant.

Finally, the quality of jobs being created has deteriorated from 18 months ago, according to CIBC's Employment Quality Index which looks at full-time versus part-time jobs, self-employment versus paid employment and comparative wages across 100 sectors.

"One of the reasons we look at the quality is the fact that the number of new jobs is really the tip of the iceberg," said Tal. "Any information about what is happening in this black box is actually good."

(Reporting By Louise Egan; Editing by Janet Guttsman)

david wright cory booker cj wilson cubs ellsbury brad pitt and angelina jolie brad and angelina

Monday, May 28, 2012

Check in married and then check out single

The American marriage, it seems, is on the rocks. The common line ? true or not ? is that half of all marriages in this country end in divorce.

So here comes a plucky entrepreneur from, of all places, the Netherlands, with a wild, you?ve-got-to-be-joking plan to profit from the sorry state of so many American unions.

It?s called Divorce Hotel, and the idea is this: Check in on Friday, married. Then, with the help of mediators and independent lawyers, check out on Sunday, divorce papers in hand, all for a flat fee.

And ? why not? ? toss in some reality TV for good measure.

Unusual as it sounds, the Divorce Hotel concept is up and running in the Netherlands, where its mastermind, Jim Halfens, is helping unhappy marrieds divorce en suite. Seventeen couples have tried it so far. All but one left divorce-ready.

Now Mr. Halfens, 33, wants to take the idea to the United States. He is negotiating with hotels in several cities, including New York and Los Angeles, as well as with law firms and, yes, two television production companies ? for a reality show.

American divorce lawyers roll their eyes. Sure, ?Divorce Hotel? sounds catchy. But most breakups are too complicated ? or, frankly, too acrimonious ? to be worked out in a cozy hotel room somewhere.

Robert S. Cohen, the lawyer who helped guide Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, Christie Brinkley, Ivana Trump and other A-listers to splitsville, says he wishes he?d thought of the idea. It?s a great gimmick, he says ? but as a practical matter, he adds, it probably wouldn?t work for most couples, let alone for the well-heeled types he advises.

It might if a couple were still friends and their financial arrangements were straightforward, he says. But in his view, it?s unlikely to work for complicated cases involving, say, significant property or business holdings, complex stock options or offshore accounts that must be traced or assessed.

?The notion of being able to ? at the beginning of a split-up ? spend a weekend putting these various pieces together and coming to a solution to them would be virtually impossible,? Mr. Cohen says. ?I don?t see how one would do it and come up with a fair result.?

He notes that divorce proceedings are often a highly emotional time for couples. ?And the notion they?re now going to spend two days with each other at some fancy hotel seems to me not to be a very likely scenario,? he says. ?Most people getting divorced don?t want to see each other again except when they have to.?

Mr. Cohen would be the first to tell you that divorce is big business these days. In the United States alone, estimates of what might be called the divorce industry range from $50 billion to $175 billion a year, depending on what costs are included. (Lawyers, after all, are only the beginning.) More than 1.2 million people in the United States filed for divorce in 2009, the most recent year for which data are available, according to the National Center for State Courts.

Mr. Halfens came up with the idea for Divorce Hotel after watching a college friend go through a painful divorce.

?He was losing weight, he was unable to have fun in life anymore and they were fighting every time you saw them ? it was horrible,? Mr. Halfens says of his friend. The divorce negotiations dragged on for five months, he says ? not all that long, by American standards.

?I was convinced there has to be another way,? Mr. Halfens says.

So, drawing on a background in marketing, as well as a stint at a law firm, he opened Divorce Hotel. And, by the way, it isn?t just a single hotel. Mr. Halfens has struck agreements with six high-end hotels in the Netherlands, most of which are reluctant to be seen as the Divorce Hotel, or even to divulge that they participate in the program.

Couples stay in separate rooms. A suite is used for mediation talks. Hotel staff members receive special instructions ? and are told that these are no ordinary guests. ?You don?t want the hotel crew wishing you a very nice weekend and hoping you have lots of fun here,? says Mr. Halfens, who evaluates couples first, to enhance the odds of success.

Divorce Hotel charges a flat fee of $3,500 to $10,000, depending on the complexity of a couple?s financial arrangements. Divorces in the United States tend to cost $5,000 to $20,000, though the cost can soar depending on the assets involved, the case?s complexity and, perhaps most crucially, whether child custody is an issue, according to Randall M. Kessler, chairman of the American Bar Association?s family law section.

Child custody battles and cases involving complex financial arrangements, such as self-owned businesses and stock options, tend to be the costliest, he says, with fees often exceeding $100,000 from each party.

Once the couple check out, they need only show the papers to a judge to have their divorce made final. Of course, marriage laws vary from state to state, which is why Mr. Halfens is in talks with law firms and hotels in different states.

Last September, a 44-year-old computer consultant in the Netherlands checked into a Divorce Hotel with his wife. He spoke on the condition that his full name not be used, to protect their privacy.

Both had been through divorces before. The first time, he says, he lost the equivalent of $30,000 just on lawyer and court costs. The process took a year.

?There was a lot of fighting ? not by us, but our lawyers,? he recalls. ?Every letter her attorney wrote had to be answered by mine. That financially ruined me.?

He and his second wife wanted to end their seven-year marriage on friendly terms. ?We were both divorced before and we both experienced a lot of pain and misery,? he says.

So they opted for the Divorce Hotel ? and were thrilled with the results. On his divorce weekend, he says, they went out on the town for dinner and wine. ?It wasn?t weird or wrong,? he says, ?We felt great ? like friends.?

Mr. Halfens tells the story of one couple who got along so well during the weekend talks that the mediator wondered whether they would reconcile. ?They were so positive that they went to the beach together,? he says. Ultimately, though, they pressed on with the divorce. Another time, a couple shared their final night together in the hotel?s honeymoon suite.

?We were a bit flabbergasted,? Mr. Halfens says. That couple, too, ended up divorcing.

Mr. Halfens has big plans for Divorce Hotel. He?s written a book, due out next year, and says that in addition to the hotels in the United States, he has talked to hotels in Britain, Italy and Germany about hosting his program.

Under his agreements with the two American production companies, Base Productions and A. Smith & Company, some couples would be followed and filmed as they go through Divorce Hotel.

Mickey Stern, co-chief executive of Base Productions, says he jumped at the chance to produce a show around Divorce Hotel. ?These are real people getting real divorces ? or at least attempting to get real divorces ? and it has all of the human drama of this significant process all condensed down into a very short period of time,? Mr. Stern says. Given the number of people who get divorces in the United States ? and the possibility for some TV fireworks ? the audience could be huge, he says.

?Divorce Hotel is as real as it gets,? he says. ?If there?s a conflict, it?s real because the stakes are real.? He says he expects the show to have its debut this fall, although he declined to name the network.

Television aside, could Divorce Hotel really work here? Mr. Cohen, the divorce lawyer, says the courts are so backed up with cases that people are moving toward mediation and arbitration to end marriages, at least when huge sums of money or child custody are not at stake.

But, like Mr. Cohen, Jason Marks, a divorce lawyer in Miami, says complex cases cannot be resolved in a weekend. And some people may do all sorts of things when a marriage runs into trouble: hide money, undervalue assets, perpetrate fraud.

?That happens all the time,? Mr. Marks says. It takes time ? and expensive lawyers ? to sort it all out.

Mr. Halfens concedes that only one of every three couples that apply for his program is accepted. His team tries to ensure that both parties want to divorce and are willing to work with a mediator. If the couple is bickering or barely speaking to each other, or if greed or vengeance seems to be a motivation, the couple is rejected.

Mr. Halfens, who is not married, has already invited Demi Moore and Ashton Kutcher to Divorce Hotel, he says. They?re a perfect fit, in his view, since they?ve indicated they want to end their six-year marriage on friendly terms.

He hasn?t heard back.

This story, "Quick Getaways, at the Divorce Hotel," originally appeared in The New York Times.

Copyright ? 2012 The New York Times

doonesbury padma lakshmi daughtry lakers trade ann arbor news ides of march elizabeth smart

Think Congress is sophomoric? A study says you're right

WASHINGTON?

? If it sounds like the debates in Congress have devolved into those of teenagers, it's because they have.

Discourse in the House and Senate has dropped a full grade level ? to the equivalent of high school sophomore, according to a new study.

Call this the dumbing down of Congress in a partisan age. Or a shift to plain-spoken populism ignited by the new class of tea party Republicans.

But what has become clear in the new research is that the soaring oratory that once filled the floors of the House and Senate with million-dollar diction and sophisticated syntax is making way for a more modest approach.

"Congress is changing as an institution, and what you see is more and more members gearing their speeches as sound bites or YouTube clips," said Lee Drutman, a senior fellow at the nonpartisan Sunlight Foundation, which compiled the study released Monday.

"You can [hark] back to a golden age of Congress when members quoted Shakespeare on the floor and really engaged in debate and talked to each other and tried to reason back and forth," he said.

Consider Everett M. Dirksen, the legendary Republican senator from Illinois, who defended a civil rights bill in 1964 by paraphrasing 19th century French writer Victor Hugo: "Stronger than all the armies is an idea whose time has come."

But that was then.

In an analysis of floor debates over the last several years, the study found that newer lawmakers tended to speak at a lower grade level than the veterans of congressional speechifying.

And political moderates among both Republicans and Democrats tended to carry on at a higher grade level than those more partisan liberals or conservatives.

With that framework in mind, it should come as no surprise that the lawmakers at the bottom of the list, speaking at the lowest grade level, are among the most ardent tea party Republicans in the freshman class. Rep. Mick Mulvaney of South Carolina, Rep. Robert Woodall of Georgia and Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky were the bottom three ? speaking at about an eighth-grade level, the study found.

"We look at it as a badge of honor," said Mulvaney, a graduate of Georgetown University and the University of North Carolina Law School, who notes that he often speaks on the floor "extemporaneously."

"It's a conscious decision on my part. We are trying to be clear and trying to be concise," he added. He said he and his wife had been known to diagram sentences at the dinner table, a byproduct of having schoolteacher parents.

"I can explain the difference between 'fewer' and 'less,'" Mulvaney said, but he acknowledged that he still stumbled over the difference between "farther" and "further."

"I don't think people see the polysyllabic words ? or the number of words ? in a sentence as a sign of your intelligence," he said.

As a case in point, he cites fellow Republican Rep. Dan Lungren of Gold River, a seasoned politician who topped the list as the lawmaker with the highest level of speech ? that of a college senior.

That makes Lungren almost a throwback ? on par with the Federalist Papers (a 17.1 grade level) or the U.S. Constitution (17.8 grade level) ? though it is not clear his speeches are easier to understand.

"The canard that somehow we are tearing the Constitution up just does not stand any kind of inquiry whatsoever," Lungren said during a debate over the Patriot Act. "The suggestion that somehow we are invading the civil liberties of citizens is negated by the language in the three sections of the bill that we have before us."

Californians ranked among the better spoken overall, and the No. 2 slot went to Rep.Lucille Roybal-Allard(D-East Los Angeles), at almost a 16th-grade level. Her skills were on display during last week's debate on a GOP version of the Violence Against Women Act that Democrats largely opposed.

"I cannot in good conscience vote to pass this version of VAWA, as it erases 18 years of bipartisan efforts to respond to the needs of victims of domestic violence," she said. "I am also disappointed that, yet again, provisions to alleviate the economic factors that keep victims in abusive relationships have not been included."

The best and worst speeches may be in the ear of the listener, and the study noted that President Obama's 2012 State of the Union address was judged by other researchers to rank at the eighth-grade level for the third year in a row.

As for those high-powered words from the Scholastic Assessment Test, memorized and recited by legions of high schoolers, they go virtually unspoken in Congress.

Of the 100 words on SAT preparation study lists, 14 are missing entirely from the Congressional Record for this Congress ? notably "florid," "hackneyed," "ostentatious" and "querulous."

The most-used SAT word ? "compromise" ? was said the most by Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.), the majority leader, who is fond of declaring, "Legislation is the art of compromise."

But in this partisan environment, as the study noted, even saying the word 142 times "does not make it so."

lisa.mascaro@latimes.com

hbo luck dwight howard unc asheville stephen jackson nba trade deadline cbs ncaa tournament

Terps women fall to Northwestern, 9-7, in NCAA lacrosse semifinal

STONY BROOK, N.Y.?

It wasn?t for the national championship this time, but the Maryland and Northwestern women?s lacrosse teams staged another classic NCAAtournament showdown Friday night at Kenneth P. LaValle Stadium.

The two traded national titles the last two years, but this time, defending champion Northwestern earned only a trip to the title game by slipping past the Terrapins, 9-7, in the semifinal.

Taylor Thornton, one of five finalists for the Tewaaraton Award , scored the eventual game winner to give No. 2 Northwestern an 8-6 lead with 16:19 to go and added an insurance goal with 1:26 left.

Shannon Smith, the 2011 Tewaaraton winner, who had four goals in last year?s 8-7 title-game win over the Terrapins, didn?t score a goal but dished out four assists. Wildcats goalie Brianne LoManto made only five saves but made point-blank stops against Terps attackers Kristy Black and Katie Schwarzmann to help hold Maryland scoreless for the final 13:37.

The No. 3 Terrapins (19-4) got off to a quick start but struggled with possession during the second half, especially in a key stretch when the Wildcats scored four straight times. Northwestern dominated the draws in the second half winning seven of eight and finished with 13 of 18.

?Draws were really important,? Schwarzmann said, ?and credit to Northwestern. They did a great job coming up with those and really maintinaing possession when they had the ball. We tried to fight for those and we could have done a better job obviously, but when we had possession, we had a few too many turnovers and just couldn?t do what we needed to do.?

Northwestern (20-2) will meet No. 4 Syracuse for the national championship Sunday at 8 p.m. at LaValle Stadium. The Orange earned its first appearance in the final with an upset of No. 1 Florida in Friday night?s other semifinal, rallying from seven goals down to win 14-13 in double overtime.

The Wildcats, who resurrected their program in 2002 after nine years of club status, will be aiming for their seventh title in eight years against a Syracuse team they edged 11-9 in overtime early in the season.

The two most successful teams in NCAA women?s lacrosse history have met three straight times on Memorial Day weekend with the Terps winning the 2010 title and the Wildcats taking the title back last season. Between them, they have won 15 of the last 20 Division I titles. Maryland has 10 titles overall, including seven in a row.

The teams were tied at every point Friday until Maryland took a 6-4 lead on Schwarzmann?s free-position goal. The Wildcats never lost their poise.

?We?ve been in that position so many times this year,? Smith said, ?I knew it was going to come down to getting the draw control. We were running fine on offense. We were patient, looking for the open cutter. Every person that was in on the offense did a phenomenal job with cutting, keeping their defenders busy and allowing our offense to move.?

The Wildcats quickly turned the momentum and scored four straight times, the biggest run of the game. Smith fed Kara Mupo, Amanda Macaluso scored a free-position goal, Smith fed Lacey Vigmostad and Thorton made it an 8-6 lead on an unassisted goal.

Schwarzmann, also a Tewaaraton finalist, brought the Terps within one on a free-position goal with 13:37 to go.

Maryland had an excellent chance to tie when Kelly McPartland, on a free-position, opted to pass to Kristy Black rather than shoot. Black, open on the left side of the crease, had the angle but LoManto made the point-black stop with 11:53 to go and made another against Schwarzmann with 6:53 to go.

?One of the things I?ve learned throughout 10 years of playing goal is it?s not how many saves you have in a game sometimes, it?s when you have the saves,? LoManto said. ?We all want to make a lot of saves and, of course, you may not make every save you want, so you try to stay patient and confident and try to make those big saves.?

The Terps had enough trouble getting possesion, but they hurt themselves when they had to play two players down for two minutes, starting at the 4:34 mark after yellow cards on McPartland and on the Maryland bench. That helped the Wildcats scored their last goal and run out most of the rest of the time.

katherine.dunn@baltsun.com

Northwestern 4 5 -- 9

Maryland 5 2 -- 7

Goals: N?Russo 2, Thornton 2, Fitzgerald, Macaluso, Frank, Vimostad, Mupo; M?Schwarmann 3, Johnson, McPartland, Griffin, Black. Assists: N?Smith 4; M?Black 2. Saves: N?LoManto 5; M?Dipper 5.

gmail down tim lincecum ryan oneal file taxes online tupac shakur sledge hammer tax day freebies

Biden says end to wars gives US new flexibility (The Arizona Republic)

Share With Friends: Share on FacebookTweet ThisPost to Google-BuzzSend on GmailPost to Linked-InSubscribe to This Feed | Rss To Twitter | Politics - Top Stories News, RSS Feeds and Widgets via Feedzilla.

shooting at chardon high school sasha baron cohen stacy keibler stacy keibler all star game oscar red carpet daytona 500 start time